ILLUMINA (LOMO) Super35 High Speed Cine Lenses

ILLUMINA (LOMO) Super35 High Speed Cine Lenses

A fellow filmmaker & my go to guy when it comes to info on Russian lenses, Tomasz Wolski aka Film Cyfeowy has recently written a wonderful article for the Polish Filammking Magazine “FilmPro” (check out their Website & Facebook). The article is about Illumina MK-II Cine lenses from LOMO, a legendary producer of film cameras and lenses, with which the likes of Andrzej Tarkowski – among others – has shot films.

Below, Tomasz takes a closer look not only at these lenses, but their history as well. This is definitely a very useful read for any self respecting DP and I’m very excited to share it with you together with my own thoughts at the bottom.

Over to Tomasz:

 First I would like to draw attention to the name itself: The Leningrad Optical-Mechanical Association abbreviated in Russian stands for LOMO. On the camera body the name is simply written as LOMO, so from now on I will use only this term.

“Made in USSR” inscription on vintage LOMO lens

The first LOMO factory was established exactly 100 years ago in 1914 in Saint Petersburg, as a cooperative effort between the Russians and the French. During the First World War it supplied the Russian army with weapon sights, and in 1933 produced its first film camera. Russian – and later Soviet – optical plants operated under different names over time as a result of their reorganization: WTOMP; WOOMP; GOMZ; and in 1962, they took the name LOMO, only soon after to change it again to LOOMP. Through the years the factory produced many items including Smiena and LOMO LC-A cameras, a copy of the Leica camera under the name VOOMP, 8mm and Super 8mm cameras (e.g. Aurora, Lantan, Sport, and of course Lomo), as well as lenses for Konvas and Kinor cameras. In 1993, LOMO was privatized. Today, it produces mainly telescopes and microscopes. The last lenses to come out of the LOMO factory were produced in the early 90s. This appeared to be the end of the production line of e.g. LOMO’s anamorphic lenses, which are very commonly used by camera operators in short films and commercials. These and LOMO spherical lenses (OCT18 and OCT19) are still very attractive in an era of vintage fashion. Their imperfection provides the ideal contrast to the exaggerated perfection guaranteed to us by the producers of modern cameras. They soften the image, are less contrastive, whites are accompanied by a halo effect, and shining lights create a unique flare and unusual reflection. This however, is a topic for another article.

Lens cover with LOMO graphic symbol from old lens with OCT19 mount

Drawing our attention back to LOMO, it turned out that the history of these lenses with their legendary emblem did not end in the 90s. They are currently being produced by Luma Tech, a Canadian company whose founder and director is Russian Gregory Mirand. He is not just any man. In 1972, he graduated from the Leningrad Institute of Film Engineering, which from today’s point of view is very curious given that such courses of study no longer exist. Mirand quickly left the Soviet Union and settled in Canada, where he began to collaborate with Kingsway Ltd., a company dealing in the sale and service of film and audio equipment. What is interesting is that at the time, Kingsway was the only representative of Jean-Pierre Beavial, or Aaton, cameras. Mirand thus became one of the most sought-after engineers and chief specialists of this French camera. Mirand spent the following years at W.F. White, where he trained technicians and oversaw the film equipment rental department. When Panavision bought out White, Mirand began operations on his own account and in 1997, founded Luma Tech.

LOMO inscription on ILLUMINA lens

Luma Tech initially produced high-speed lenses (T1.3) for Super 16 cameras, and in recent years has also begun selling Super 35 high-speed prime lenses. Mirand not only draws from his own experience, but also from contacts in Russia. Illumina lenses are assembled for the Luma Tech project in a factory in Saint Petersburg. The glass however originates from the storehouses of Schott, a German optical company which supplies the largest of lens producers. LOMO specialists then process and coat them according to their own formula.

ILLUMINA Super35 Cine Primes

Illumina lens prototypes first saw the light of day in 2009 at the NAB show in Las Vegas. They hit the shelves for public sale one year later. Initially on offer from Luma Tech were lenses with 18mm, 25mm, 35mm, 50mm, and 85mm focal lengths. Then came a 135, and recently a 14 as well. They all have a T1.3 aperture minimum, except for the 14 and 135mm lenses, on which the “full aperture” is set to T1.8. The new lenses are marked as MKII. This is how Luma Tech has designated the ones produced after 2011. At that time the LOMO factory purchased new machinery and chose a team of workers, which deals exclusively with lenses. They introduced a modification that reduced internal friction in the focus mechanism.

Zeiss Master Prime 35mm vs Illumina MKII 35mm size comparison

Visually, Illuminas resemble Zeiss Master Prime lenses. Aperture and focus designation are in yellow. The aperture ring, in contrast to other lenses, is located near the front lens. This appears to be inherited from older lenses. ll Illuminas have a PL mount and a 95mm front element diameter, except for the 14mm lens (which has a 120mm). They have a 5K resolution, and the focus ring rotates 270 degrees. These lenses are not heavy, as they weight about 1.5-2kg each. In comparison with the Zeiss Master Prime they are much smaller.

Illumina 35
Click to see 5K frame grabs from Red Epic
Zeiss Master Prime 35
Click to see 5K frame grabs from Red Epic

The image obtained from these lenses is sharp and at first glance is comparable with the Zeiss Master Prime. I showed experienced camera operators materials shot with both lenses and they were not sure which was which. The full aperture opening in the Illuminas obviously causes more blurring and softens the images, with chromatic aberrations also visible, but the drop in value is comparable to the lenses of other companies. I also discovered an interesting contour with the backlight. However, this may just be an effect of reflections that appear between the lens and OLPR/IF filter in the camera. When filming vertically with the Illumina 18mm I did not notice any distortions. They do appear with the 14mm, but I must admit that they are not significant.

 Illumina 18mm without anti-reflection coating
Illumina 18mm without anti-reflection coating

Illuminas, as with the Cooke Mini S4/i lenses, are available in two versions: with and without the anti-reflection coating. In the case of the Cooke lenses, a version must be chosen at the time of purchase; but the Canadian producer proposed a payment for additional lenses ($4,800 per set for 18-85mm focal length). Apparently changing the lens is not complicated and can be done using the appropriate tools. This means that in a few minutes you can change a perfect image to “vintage”.

I compared 18mm lenses with and without the anti-reflection coating. There was a great difference. Directing the light into the camera with a standard coating, we get a soft flare, and the source of light is outlined by a dust jacket. However, in the version without the coating, we get a whole set of different colored flares, or one large one in the case of a central light.

Illumina 18mm with anti-reflection coating
Illumina 18mm without anti-reflection coating. Central light source

A few years ago during a lens presentation in Saint Petersburg, Gregory Miranda said, “We have created unique lenses of the same quality as those manufactured by the world’s leading producers of optics. At the same time, we have been able to achieve the optimal value for money.” There is some truth in this, given the price of the competition. The price for a set of Illuminas (18mm – 85mm) is almost 30,000 euros (just under $40k in US), which is similar to the amount you would have to pay for a Cooke mini S4/i set. But the Cooke lens has a minimum aperture value of T2.8. Illumina lenses generally make a good impression. In Poland, camera operators use them mainly in advertisements and short student films. Abroad they have been used by e.g. Werner Herzog when filming “Queen of the Desert” featuring Nicole Kidman. Luma Tech also has some interesting plans for the future. The company wants to release a new series of lenses which have undergone complicated analyses and the Lumacon calibration system (a computer test which among others quickly identifies the best focus point, controls lens resolution, and indicated aberrations), and a backwards compatible solution for anamorphic lenses. The latter are to be relatively compact and reasonably priced. The producer has also revealed that they will have some surprising additional features, which at the moment are still a mystery. What exactly Luma Tech has in store we will find out at the next NAB show.

A big thank you Tomasz and FilmPro magazine for letting me share their article. I was aware of these lenses before I read Tomasz’s article, but this is a great insight into their background and LOMO in general.

Illumina lenses are of course still very expensive for an owner operator, but I did find these at much lower price on ebay before and they are definitely the most affordable T1.3 cine lenses out there.

Here are some videos shot with Illumina lenses to give you a better idea what they are cable of in good hands of Kevin Zhang!

The ancestor of the tea, some shots from a documentary. Shot on Red epic and S35 Illumina lenses from Kevin Zhang on Vimeo.

For those who want to get deeper into how these lenses perform against some of the best and most expensive alternatives in the world, see this in-depth comparison test put together by Matt Duclos and some DPs on Reduser. This test is a real eye opener and you can see that stopped down to T2.8, Illumina lenses do indeed hold their own against the Zeiss Master Primes as mentioned above by Tomasz.

Personally I’ve only had an opportunity to shoot with Carl Zeiss Super Speed MKIIs (also featured in the comparison test). They are surely my dream lenses (for now I own the “little me” Zeiss Superspeed S16 MKI set) but they are so expensive that I’m not sure I’ll even be able to justify owning them. Although Illuminas are a bit cheaper, most of us probably won’t be able to afford a set, but it’s always useful to know as much as you can about various lenses, so when the next big project comes along, you can rent the most suitable lenses for it.

I try my best to make this website a great resource for people interested in vintage lenses for video use, so I hope you’ve enjoyed this & other posts. I hope they will help you save some money on your future lens investments too. I’ve joined the ebay affiliate program to help me run this website, fund my tests & lens giveaways, so if you found this content useful and would like to help me produce more similar content, please use the ebay links in this post if you’re planning to buy one of these lenses or bookmark or use this link if you want to buy anything else on or this link if you shop on You will not be spending a penny more using these links, while still helping as eBay will pay out a small percentage from any purchase or successful bid, which in turn will support new content on Thank you.

5 Responses to ILLUMINA (LOMO) Super35 High Speed Cine Lenses

  1. Great article and now bookmarking this as well. Keeping this in mind for potential tests in the near future. Thank you so much for this. ^__^

  2. Do you think the S16 would be useful on a Blackmagic URSA and its new URSA Mini to come? Since the lens coverage is more for Super 16mm type and vignetting is foresee right?
    Some users has reported in “Window / Crop” mode (which I don’t actually understand yet since never use this mode with BMCC or current URSA), the S16 Illuminas work perfectly fine at 2k resolution.

    Do you guys have any experience or thought on this?

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.